tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6693950082152211516.post5114686056555325337..comments2023-10-26T00:08:26.205+01:00Comments on The Boiling Frog: Hot WiredTheBoilingFroghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00791961503315586243noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6693950082152211516.post-21196006377187014542013-10-22T12:22:37.540+01:002013-10-22T12:22:37.540+01:00Excellent questions. Regarding the legal judgement...Excellent questions. Regarding the legal judgement I have tried searching for it last night and this morning to no avail as yet. Agree with points 2, 3, and 4. As for 5 see answer to Woodsy42 above.TheBoilingFroghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00791961503315586243noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6693950082152211516.post-36969758927866308942013-10-22T12:19:14.545+01:002013-10-22T12:19:14.545+01:00It goes without saying that the "investment&q...It goes without saying that the "investment" is from taxes<br /><br />http://ces-cic.org/aboutus.htmlTheBoilingFroghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00791961503315586243noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6693950082152211516.post-9333693016820655732013-10-22T12:02:58.025+01:002013-10-22T12:02:58.025+01:00"Legalities" never stopped builders, or ..."Legalities" never stopped builders, or window & facia replacement companies from moving BT's "eyelets". They really mean the brackets which attach overhead wiring to the house. Good luck with getting BT act more swiftly on dealing with that. They can't even sort out damaged or vandalised main cables in less than a week now. The "good old days" of PoTel may not have been perfect, but at least you spoke to someone with knowledge of the system when making a complaint - most fault reception was done by former engineers. Now they are a "communications" company which is incapable of communicating.<br /><br />As for external insulation, Pierre Gosselin (NoTricksZone) has posted many articles on the folly of this method, since it is being used extensively in Germany. Major problems with damp, are just one issue...<br />microdavehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01352078582764696261noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6693950082152211516.post-28258323985743095562013-10-22T09:45:00.660+01:002013-10-22T09:45:00.660+01:00There's an awful lot wrong with everything sai...There's an awful lot wrong with everything said there:<br /><br />1) What is this legal judgement that says only BT can remove these eyelets (whatever the hell they are)?<br /><br />2) He's passing the buck. As the MP for his constituents, why doesn't he contact BT directly and ask them nicely to get a shimmy on?<br /><br />3) Why does "the Minister" he refers to have any right to TELL BT to do anything?<br /><br />4) Why does anyone "deserve" warmth?<br /><br />5) As already pointed out, it would be interesting to know where that £20million came from - I also suspect that its source is taxation. I.e. moneys stolen from Peter so that Paul can have his house externally cladded.Anthemhttp://www.anthemshrugs.co.uknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6693950082152211516.post-48739715669479257602013-10-21T23:54:51.012+01:002013-10-21T23:54:51.012+01:00It's not BT that bothers me. What I want to kn...It's not BT that bothers me. What I want to know is from where they are sourcing the £20million 'investment'? One suspects that what is 'investment' to them is probably grants made up from taxes from someone else.woodsy42http://www.grumpologist.blogspot.comnoreply@blogger.com