So in that spirit let’s have a game of TBF’s “Missing Words Round”. From the paragraphs that follow try to guess the missing words in the BBC website headline above…and no cheating.
The BBC reports that:
“a grassroots initiative” [sic] to protect the quality of Europe's drinking water and stop it being privatised has got on to the agenda of EU lawmakers in Brussels”. It is the first European Citizens' Initiative (ECI) to reach that stage, the European Commission says.Ah our old friend the European Citizens' Initiative which was an 'innovation' of the Lisbon Treaty, and is laughably aimed at increasing democracy in the EU. So in the spirit of democracy I’ll produce a quick guide here on how to follow the procedure to “encourage” the EU Commission to legislate on matters that concerns EU citizens (my emphasis throughout):
- First you need find out if the initiative or idea is an EU Commission competence and that the proposed initiative is not manifestly contrary to the EU values as set out in Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union. If not it immediately fails.
- Then a citizens' initiative has to be proposed by a citizens' committee composed of at least 7 EU citizens old enough to vote in European Parliament elections and living in at least 7 different member states. The committee must designate from among its members a representative and a substitute to speak and act on their behalf. These will be the contact persons who will liaise between the committee and the Commission throughout the procedure.
- Then before organisers can start collecting statements of support from citizens, they have to request the registration of their proposed initiative on this website. This includes providing personal details of the 7 required committee members (full names, postal addresses, nationalities and dates of birth), indicating specifically the representative and his/her substitute as well as their e-mail addresses and telephone numbers. And documents that prove the full names, postal addresses, nationalities and dates of birth of each of the 7 members of the citizens’ committee.
- At the time of registration and throughout the procedure, organisers must provide up-to-date information on all sources of support and funding worth more than €500 per year and per sponsor.
- Organisers who wish to collect statements of support online must build an online collection system, accessible through their website, to ensure that data complies with EU data protection legislation.
- As soon as the registration of the proposed initiative has been confirmed, organisers can start collecting statements of support from citizens. They have 12 months to collect the required number of statements of support (1 million overall including a minimum number in at least 7 member states – see Minimum number of signatories per member state).
- Don't forget in order to collect statements of support, organisers have to use specific forms which comply with the models for the statement of support form set out in Annex III of the Regulation on the citizens' initiative, and which include all required information regarding the proposed initiative.
- Once organisers have collected the necessary statements of support, they must ask the competent national authorities in each member state where they have collected statements of support to certify the number of valid statements of support collected for that country.
- Commission representatives will meet the organisers so they can explain in detail the issues raised in their initiative.
- the organisers will have the opportunity to present their initiative at a public hearing in the European Parliament.
- the Commission will adopt a formal response spelling out what action it will propose in response to the citizens' initiative, if any, and the reasons for doing or not doing so.
- 7 open
- 7 closed (failed)
- 6 withdrawn
- 5 failed due to lack of support
- and just 1 that has successfully been submitted to the Commission
And just in case there is any doubt where the BBC's sentiments lie, further down the article states this:
European Citizens' Initiative: Direct democracy tool launched in April 2012How the BBC has come to this conclusion is a wonderment to behold. Particularly as Switzerland, via (proper) Direct Democracy, recently backed a proposal to bring back strict quotas for immigration from EU countries. And now they are paying the price of the EU’s disappointment.
On the face of it it looks like EU financed astroturfing with filters to ensure no extraneous proposals contaminate the process. The term 'organised civil society' comes to mind, but EU wide, so no purely national interests need apply.
ReplyDeleteThat is, if it isn't totally an exercise in bullshit.
It doesn't look as if it's designed to allow the possibility of forcing them to do things they are not already inclined toward.
"Then a citizens' initiative has to be proposed by a citizens' committee composed of at least 7 EU citizens old enough to vote in European Parliament elections and living in at least 7 different member states. The committee must designate from among its members a representative and a substitute to speak and act on their behalf. These will be the contact persons who will liaise between the committee and the Commission throughout the procedure."
Should be a doddle for bodies like the WWF, however I don't think they need to mess with anything like this, as they already have effective channels into the EU and beyond.
Should be a doddle for bodies like the WWF...
DeleteYep...note the first failed petition which fulfilled the all the criteria:
The entry into force of the EU's new citizens' initiative (ECI) - a petition procedure under the Lisbon Treaty allowing European citizens to demand action in a particular area - is likely to be welcomed by a legal battle between Greenpeace and the EU institutions.
The environmental NGO has successfully collected the required 1 million signatories in a petition calling on the EU to ban GMOs, but officials from both the European Commission and the European Parliament say the move is premature.
It is purely a gesture then, unless it chances to come up with something that's genuinely wanted by the Commission and they overlooked.
DeleteI wonder how much it costs?
I suspect the fix is already in concerning GMOs and it's the other way to what Greenpeace want.
I hope Switzerland is able to weather the EU storm of vindictiveness over their democratic decision for self-preservation.
ReplyDeleteYes, I'm sure Switzerland can look after itself much to the EU's chagrin.
DeleteI'm sure it's a misprint, TBF.
ReplyDelete:-)
DeleteYep, not for the ordinary 'EU Citizen', is it TBF?
ReplyDeleteThe whole sham is set up for the bought and paid for NGOs - the EU's onside sock puppets.
Democracy by proxy.
I've often how they look at themselves in the mirror, but I would think that would be easy when there's no reflection.
As you've pointed out, our media must know all this and are blatantly campaigning for the EU prior to the EU elections.
Unfortunately for TPTB I think that this one might blow up in their faces - the GM thing, whether justified or not, tends to raise some amount of passion in certain quarters.
Yep, not for the ordinary 'EU Citizen', is it TBF?
ReplyDeleteThe whole sham is set up for the bought and paid for NGOs - the EU's onside sock puppets.
Exactly, see answer to cosmic above.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete