Showing posts with label Super-Injunctions. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Super-Injunctions. Show all posts

Wednesday, 25 May 2011

UK Government Censors Youtube

Trawling through Hansard this morning, I spot that John Hemming was again highlighting the ludicrous situation regarding injunctions. However this part of his speech caught my eye (my emphasis):
"We have no true freedom of speech when people can be jailed for complaining about their problems. This country seems to have a penchant for covering up problems that would be discussed openly in others.

Florence Bellone, a Belgian journalist, recorded an interview with Carol Hughes and Lucille O’Regan in Ireland, which was broadcast on RTBF in Belgium. A copy was placed on YouTube, but access in the UK is now blocked as a result of what YouTube calls a “government request”. What can be so frightening about that interview that people in the UK are not allowed to see it, but it can be broadcast in Belgium?"

And sure enough, trying to access the relevant video, titled "Please take me home" prompts the message pictured above. There is fortunately another version available which has yet to be censored, so we can see what the fuss is about, or not. As Hemming rightly asks what's so frightening about the interview - it's nearly all in French anyway (although there is a rough translation in the comments below). Not only that but Hemming himself is featured in the video, so our Government is censoring videos to ensure that we cannot see or hear our own elected representatives being interviewed.

It's another example of the "Ryan Giggs effect" - I wouldn't have bothered searching for or watching the video if it hadn't been subjected to a "Government removal request" and it's wonderful how illiterate governments are when it comes to the internet. Not only can we download the version available and keep uploading it as fast as it's taken down, but a simple use of a proxy server website by-passes the restrictions in seconds.

Monday, 23 May 2011

Ryan Giggs

Finally, Mr Giggs has been named in parliament as the footballer who has an injunction against Big Brother (how ironic) wannabe contestant Imogen Thomas.

As I've blogged before, and like many others, I couldn't care less about Mr Giggs' personal life, but I do care that his actions have led to the possibility of journalist Giles Coren being arrested in secret, tried in secret (without a jury) and jailed in secret - for the first time in British history.

Oh what a wonderful mess the European inspired Human Rights Act has made of our justice system.

Monday, 9 May 2011

Carry On Injunction

This is getting ridiculous:
Fans of David Schneider, the comedian and actor, have taken to Twitter to complain about the star's silence on the social networking site.

He is often used by BBC radio as a "talking head", giving his opinion on Twitter developments.

His fans have taken to Twitter to complain about the silence: "Hey @davidschneider have been missing your comedy – seems like you have been chained to your desk recently!", said one.

"Looks like @davidschneider hasn't tweeted for a few days now, he must have his hands full"

The Super-Injunction Farce

The press have got themselves in a lather over the release of information on twitter of some of the names behind the recent super-injunctions. I don't really care what z-listed celebrities get up to in their private lives, but I do care about a free press. Not having a free press leads to this and this.

Most of the information on that twitter account appears largely correct - the Spanish press have already named the footballer. However Clarkson doesn't have an injunction for the reasons stated. Given that the press have been dropping clues all over the place - for example this odd article from yesterday's Mail on Sunday about Hugh Bonneville - most of the information is probably common knowledge now anyway.

Of course Parliament could do something about judges effectively writing a privacy law, but, apart from a couple of notable exceptions, I wouldn't hold your breath.

Thursday, 5 May 2011

MP Takes Out Super-Injunction

This is a disgrace:

A serving MP may have taken out a super-injunction preventing details of their activities being exposed, it was disclosed today.

The revelation came in the Commons as MPs discussed future Parliamentary business - including whether to debate creeping judge-made privacy laws and the spiralling use of gagging orders.

As soon as I find out who they are, I'm naming them.

Update: from Guido Fawkes: