Thursday, 24 February 2011

EU Rules

At no surprise to anyone, UKIP supporters or otherwise, who follow the evils of the European Arrest Warrant, Julian Assange has lost his extradition case:
The WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange is to be extradited to Sweden to face allegations of rape and sexual assault. Assange will appeal, his legal team has confirmed. If they lose he will be sent to Sweden in 10 days.
Prima facie evidence in this country is no longer required for extradition:
So it became official. The highest court in the land [House of Lords] did not think it of general public interest if one of our citizens is consigned to a foreign prison system on trumped up charges.
And so it proves:
The defence had argued that the allegations against Assange were not offences in English law and therefore not grounds for extradition.
So:
Outside the court Assange's lawyer, Mark Stephens, said the ruling had not come as a surprise and reaffirmed the Assange team's concerns that adhering to the European arrest warrant (EAW) amounted to "tick box justice".
Therefore, democracy takes a back seat:
Stephens suggested Riddle had been "hamstrung" by the EAW. "We're pretty sure the secrecy and the way [the case] has been conducted so far have registered with this judge. He's just hamstrung," he told reporters.
As I blogged here, the Guardian are outraged but not enough to campaign against our membership of the EU - you reap what you sow.

Update: Assange is in the Telegraph (my emphasis):

The ruling against him came as a result of "a European arrest warrant system run amok", he claimed.

He said: "There was no consideration during this entire process as to the merit of the allegations made against me, no consideration or examination of even the complaints made in Sweden and of course we have always known we would appeal."

5 comments:

  1. If Julian Assange is extradited to Sweden, then that will spell, for me, the death of justice in our country.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dear Cooked Frog


    To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.
    ...

    He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

    ...

    For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:



    Read the whole thing:

    http://www.ushistory.org/Declaration/document/index.htm

    Ironic or what?

    DP

    ReplyDelete
  3. Why are people so happy to let our security secrets out as though its some silly lefty game? These people never let out the secrets of the terrorist groups for us to gain from. It is purely treason, a perverted twist in their minds that gives them joy from trying to embarrass our politicians without regard for the safety of others. Remember "careless talk costs lives" it still does!
    The sooner we rid ourselves of this nasty little man and extradite him to Sweden the better

    ReplyDelete
  4. Why are people so happy to let our security secrets out as though its some silly lefty game? These people never let out the secrets of the terrorist groups for us to gain from. It is purely treason, a perverted twist in their minds that gives them joy from trying to embarrass our politicians without regard for the safety of others. Remember "careless talk costs lives" it still does!
    The sooner we rid ourselves of this nasty little man and extradite him to Sweden the better

    ReplyDelete
  5. @JiC I think we may have alread passed that moment.

    @DP Ironic indeed.

    @Anon Regardless of the actions of Assange it still does not justify extraditing any man without evidence. It could be you next.

    ReplyDelete