Showing posts with label Terrorism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Terrorism. Show all posts

Wednesday, 4 January 2012

Double Trouble

I'm glad I'm not the only one to have had doubts about Stephen Lawrence's trial, this from Tim Worstall:

No [I'm not happy about it], not because I’m some scumbag racist, no, not because it’s a bad idea that murderers go to jail. Rather, this:

But in 2005 a chink of light emerged when the double jeopardy rule was abolished, meaning the men could be re-tried.

Double jeopardy is one of our protections against them. Us as citizens against those who would rule us.

The abolition of it leaves us open to continual prosecution: if they don’t manage to get a jury to convict us first time they can just try and try again.

This is a very good example of why hard cases make bad law. That racist murderers go to jail, Hurrah!

That all 65 million of us are stripped of a protection in order to do so, Booo!

I couldn't agree more. Yes racists scumbags deserve justice and nor do I have much sympathy for Norries who allegedly has had a hard time whilst inside, but double jeopardy was there for a reason - a very good reason. As with the RIP Act used against petty crime or terrorist legislation used against innocent football fans, the slippery slope is obvious, we all will be next: tried and tried again until they get the right answer.

Wednesday, 17 November 2010

Run! Or...Er...Maybe Not

A number of bloggers have picked up on this advice to MPs if attacked:
MPs and their staff will be ordered to flee for their lives in the event of a Mumbai-style terrorist attack on Parliament, according to security advice.
But we know already that MPs won't even do this, instead they react like the proverbial rabbit caught in headlights:
A major review of security is under way after condoms full of purple flour were thrown at Tony Blair as he faced MPs in the House of Commons.

Government sources admitted that the politicians did not know what to do and expressed surprise that people were let out of the chamber.

The source said the MPs' response "did not go the way we expected". The attack would have been "incredibly serious" if the dyed flour had been anthrax or ricin.
It'll be like shooting fish in a barrel.

Tuesday, 12 January 2010

ECHR Rules Stop And Search is Illegal

The BBC reports that the European Court of Human Rights has ruled that section 44 of the Terrorism Act 2000 is illegal.

Personally in some ways I'm rather pleased, I have grave concerns regarding terrorism legislation passed by this Labour Government; I know from personal experience as a football fan regarding Section 60, that the more powers the police get, the more they abuse it.

However it's my view that Labour's draconian laws should be repealed by the British people via the ballot box, i.e. vote in another government in May.

Instead it takes a foreign court that's unaccountable to UK citizens to tell our democratically elected government that laws passed via a sovereign Parliament are illegal under European Human Rights Legislation. What a mess!

Labour are likely to drag their feet (again) on this judgment, so it will be left to the next government (probably the Conservatives) to deal with this judgment after the May elections. Will the Tories implement or reject this judgment, if they agree they leave themselves open to accusations of being soft on terror and if they disagree it will mean a bust up with Europe, which they don't want.

Along with the ECHR judgment on prisoner voting rights, the Tories' desire not to have a bust up with Europe is looking increasingly difficult.

hattip: Old Holborn.