When I started I took the view that I wouldn't have many 'rules' and those that I did have I would make up as I went along. My basic rules, which I've largely stuck to, include; try to link to as many independent blogs as I can, always 'hattip' when appropriate and above all never link to Guido Fawkes - he doesn't even appear on my blogroll.
I have a number of reasons for not linking to Guido. Despite all his protestations of trying to bring down MPs, and being a libertarian, and so forth he's actually part of the system. He has no intention of changing a system that his blog depends upon - in effect he has become a useful safety valve for them. As a result his head is far up the MSM's rectum and this was much in evidence during the Damien McBride affair. When the emails were leaked to Guido, he didn't have the courage to publish them on his own blog, despite it being hosted abroad as he is fond of telling us, instead he gave them to the MSM - the Sunday Times and News of the World. So apart from receiving some emails and passing them onto newspapers I'm not sure what Guido's 'very important' role was?
He also fails to appreciate that we are no longer a self-governing nation. As an example he began a campaign to bring back capital punishment. Whilst an important debate with strong views on both sides, this is a policy that we are unable to re-introduce if desired whilst remaining members of the Council of Europe and the EU. However, despite this small detail being pointed out to him several times, he simply refused (or failed) to acknowledge the 'elephant in the room'. A pattern of behaviour that replicates the MSM.
Above all, my main objection is that he hardly ever links to other bloggers outside the Westminster circle of Conservative Home, Ian Dale and the usual suspects. So it is with some irony that we see this post - titled "Dead Tree Press Missing Click Tricks" from him yesterday (I'm not linking to it):
...newspapers like to pretend they are the font of all knowledge and will rarely acknowledge other sources. Guido is used to being referred to by newspapers as a mysterious unnamed gossip website whenever we are leading on some scandal the papers are too timid to touch.Maybe that's true however...
In the case of our friendly commercial rivals at the Mail and the Telegraph we can only presume they don’t get it. In the last month for every reader referred to this blog by the Mail, Guido sent them 14 readers, for every reader sent by the Telegraph website, Guido sent them 12 readers. This asymmetry is counter-productive, Guido suspects they still have the print mindset, where a paper is held by the reader and holds onto the reader from cover to cover. Online the readers know the next story is really just a click away, anywhere and everywhere.
All the research suggests that linking-out doesn’t just give readers a better service, in increasing the utility to the reader websites get more traffic when they press the back-key to return, you don’t lose many. The Spectator is the biggest referrer to Guido followed by ConservativeHome, we in turn send them a fair chunk of traffic in return. Linking works in our mutual interests.
A demonstration of truly astonishing lack of self-awareness. He has become infected as a result of being in the 'Westminster Bubble' with his own self-importance.
It's the reason why, to me, that his blog often feels like reading about the internal squabblings of the Pylon Appreciation Society whilst he ignores the looming energy crisis.
His blog was essential reading for a while...now, its in take it or leave it territory
ReplyDeleteHe's made enough beer money and no longer cares, if he ever did, about the mess the UK is in. I, too was once an avid reader who dared criticise Tubby and was told to f**k off and do your own blog, so I did! Both!
ReplyDeleteHe sock puppets in his comments as well, whilst saying they are all nothing to do with him. Found that out when he did a defense of the Pope bit during his visit. Post went up quite late at night, countered with my objection to Pope being spread of AIDS and Popes attitude to condoms, as opposed to the child molesting issue that was big at time. Post got held up for about 15mins and almost instatly responded to linking to a circular arguement in praise of the Catholic position, this whole internet at fingertips posting was not by someone claiming to be P Staines, Guido, Tory Bear nor Harry Cole.
ReplyDeleteThe arguement is by the by, he has been called up on the infintile nonsense that goes on in his comments, and he is playing there anonmously them.
I stopped reading him because he is a nasty piece of work, and some of the commenters are even nastier. His blog is failing and I suspect on the way out. It used to have witty and informed commenters, and they have been driven away by the scatological and juvenile idiots who comment there now. Moreover, he never seems to have anything resembling a scoop these days, and his judgements and predictions are hilariously proved wrong, time and again.
ReplyDelete@Anon1 I do read his blog, just refuse to link to it, though as you say it no longer is that relevant
ReplyDelete@Oldrightie Excellent, your blog is much better.
@Will Rees That's a criticism continually made by Bloggerheads as well. TBH I've never read Guido's comments
@Anon2 Can't disagree
@Anon3 I've never read the comments on Guido's page - though I understand from comments on other sites they are rather 'robust'. Agree that his blog is losing its way
I'm in the same boat - used to read him regularly but since he outed someone and his blog went stratospheric many of the commenters changed and there was an influx of the ignorant. I still link to him in under my msm and semi-pros heading - people know what they're getting that way.
ReplyDeleteBtw, Froggie, I haven't given up completely - just taking time out to find a home and catch up with life. It's been three days and seems like a year already - I'll be back.
Thanks for your comment Goodnight Vienna, am pleased to hear that you haven't given up completely. Look forward to you "being back"
ReplyDelete